<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thank you, Sports Illustrated!!!!!!!!!!! (From a women&#8217;s sports fan)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fairgamenews.com/2010/02/thank-you-sports-illustrated-from-a-womens-sports-fan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fairgamenews.com/2010/02/thank-you-sports-illustrated-from-a-womens-sports-fan/</link>
	<description>seeking equality on &#8212; and off &#8212; the field</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:09:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole LaVoi</title>
		<link>http://fairgamenews.com/2010/02/thank-you-sports-illustrated-from-a-womens-sports-fan/comment-page-1/#comment-1497</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole LaVoi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairgamenews.com/?p=1066#comment-1497</guid>
		<description>Laura,
Knowing the great work you do and write about, is this written with sarcasm? Nicole</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laura,<br />
Knowing the great work you do and write about, is this written with sarcasm? Nicole</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward</title>
		<link>http://fairgamenews.com/2010/02/thank-you-sports-illustrated-from-a-womens-sports-fan/comment-page-1/#comment-1468</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 22:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairgamenews.com/?p=1066#comment-1468</guid>
		<description>THANK YOU, Laura, for your blog. You are absolutely correct in your comments. As an enlightened, heterosexual male women&#039;s sports fan, I totally think it&#039;s a great idea. 

Helen, you claim that coverage such as the Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue is intended to &quot;diminish, dismiss and demean&quot; female athletes. Two questions for you:

1.  How do you know what the intent of such actions are?  

2. Do the athletes feel the same way? If the ladies are okay with that-and apparently they are as I am-then that is that.  End of subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THANK YOU, Laura, for your blog. You are absolutely correct in your comments. As an enlightened, heterosexual male women&#8217;s sports fan, I totally think it&#8217;s a great idea. </p>
<p>Helen, you claim that coverage such as the Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue is intended to &#8220;diminish, dismiss and demean&#8221; female athletes. Two questions for you:</p>
<p>1.  How do you know what the intent of such actions are?  </p>
<p>2. Do the athletes feel the same way? If the ladies are okay with that-and apparently they are as I am-then that is that.  End of subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://fairgamenews.com/2010/02/thank-you-sports-illustrated-from-a-womens-sports-fan/comment-page-1/#comment-1464</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 14:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairgamenews.com/?p=1066#comment-1464</guid>
		<description>I disagree that &quot;any coverage is good coverage.&quot; Profoundly. Because coverage that continues to diminish, dismiss and demean female athletes is not useful. It simply continues to shove female athletes into the same box that they&#039;ve been shoved into since forever: Woman as Whore

As a &quot;crazy feminists&quot; I hope to continue to upset you by drawing attention to the continuation of those stereotypes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree that &#8220;any coverage is good coverage.&#8221; Profoundly. Because coverage that continues to diminish, dismiss and demean female athletes is not useful. It simply continues to shove female athletes into the same box that they&#8217;ve been shoved into since forever: Woman as Whore</p>
<p>As a &#8220;crazy feminists&#8221; I hope to continue to upset you by drawing attention to the continuation of those stereotypes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mandy</title>
		<link>http://fairgamenews.com/2010/02/thank-you-sports-illustrated-from-a-womens-sports-fan/comment-page-1/#comment-1455</link>
		<dc:creator>Mandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 03:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairgamenews.com/?p=1066#comment-1455</guid>
		<description>This year&#039;s swimsuit edition of SI has, on page 30, a swimbracket- with the title &quot;Move over March Madness.  It&#039;s time for February Frenzy, Baby!  You can help crown the champ&quot;  OMG!  Why does a sports magazine create so much hype about women NOT playing sports?  One more way to keep women off the contender&#039;s list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This year&#8217;s swimsuit edition of SI has, on page 30, a swimbracket- with the title &#8220;Move over March Madness.  It&#8217;s time for February Frenzy, Baby!  You can help crown the champ&#8221;  OMG!  Why does a sports magazine create so much hype about women NOT playing sports?  One more way to keep women off the contender&#8217;s list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Price</title>
		<link>http://fairgamenews.com/2010/02/thank-you-sports-illustrated-from-a-womens-sports-fan/comment-page-1/#comment-1450</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairgamenews.com/?p=1066#comment-1450</guid>
		<description>Is the number of people interested in watching women&#039;s sport really important? Isn&#039;t the key thing getting more women involved in doing sport? Who cares if people watch?

When we rumbling about how women&#039;s sports get low TV ratings or that professional purses are smaller those for men we seem to be focusing on the exact things that (a) we can&#039;t change, and (b) even if we could how does this increase women&#039;s sport participation? 

Not everything the media does (or doesn&#039;t do) is important. And the &quot;Hey, look at me!&quot; mindset they encourage is merely a sideshow to what&#039;s really important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the number of people interested in watching women&#8217;s sport really important? Isn&#8217;t the key thing getting more women involved in doing sport? Who cares if people watch?</p>
<p>When we rumbling about how women&#8217;s sports get low TV ratings or that professional purses are smaller those for men we seem to be focusing on the exact things that (a) we can&#8217;t change, and (b) even if we could how does this increase women&#8217;s sport participation? </p>
<p>Not everything the media does (or doesn&#8217;t do) is important. And the &#8220;Hey, look at me!&#8221; mindset they encourage is merely a sideshow to what&#8217;s really important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
